How to distinguish between "for the public" mouse hand?

A few days ago, the National People's Congress began to modify the Occupational Disease Prevention Act, in which one of the “definitions of occupational diseases” that has received much attention has changed significantly. Cervical spondylosis, mouse hands, eye injuries caused by long-term video work, occupational low back pain and other white-collar susceptible diseases are all expected to be included in the occupational disease list. (Southern Metropolis Daily, January 10)

With the popularity of computers, how many people are dealing with the mouse for a long time? According to medical experts' advice, the mouse hand has become a new killer of human health. Workplaces such as mouse hands are commonly included in the occupational disease list, revealing the importance attached to the physical health of employees and the protection of their own rights and interests. If the mouse operator can eventually write into the Occupational Disease Prevention Act, expanding the scope of occupational diseases and increasing the number of diseases, it also reflects the humanistic care for the health of employees at the national level.

It is believed that the starting point for the parties to amend the law is good. Diseases that have fallen on the job should indeed enter the occupational disease list. This also makes "occupational diseases" justified. However, once the law is introduced, it will become complicated at the operational level. What the public is worried about is how to prove and define, and how to prove that your mouse hand fell while working in the unit. Some people play computer at home and sink in the unit. In the game, so drop the mouse hand, do you have to pay the unit? If there is no specific rule, it is easy to bring about selective recognition. The public and private hands of the mouse will leave a tongue to the community. Look, the welfare of the civil servants is good. If you play computer games all day, you are still considered to be an occupational disease. It is recognized as a work-related injury and enjoys public medical care. In contrast, some migrant workers suffer from life-threatening occupational diseases, but they rarely receive compensation and are forced to “open their chests to inspect the lungs.” These two days of welfare benefits will only make common people more tangled.

The author has long handled the case and used a computer to handle official duties. He is most likely to fall out of occupational diseases such as the mouse hand. If the mouse hand enters the occupational disease list, he should be the beneficiary. Therefore, there is no objection to amending the Occupational Disease Prevention Act. Moreover, after the law has been amended, it will be more humane, and it will also be a major step forward for the society. The crux of the problem is that privately triggered mouse hands must not be “stretched” into the occupational disease list; in addition, too many promises guarantee poor implementation, even if they enter the catalogue, it is also a “blank check”, which will also weaken the credibility of the government and the law. .

In solving the problem of mouse hands, the public also hopes that the state and relevant departments can establish supporting measures, improve the medical insurance system, improve the overall welfare of employees, strengthen occupational protection, and allow employees to visit the doctor. Otherwise, even if the mouse is handcuffed into the occupational disease list, it would be better to have a healthy and good body.